Quoted, from today’s Independent Weekly:
“In a career of dystopic performances that have let audiences examine the suffering of humans and nature on an almost frame-by-frame basis, this one was a stand-out. Call it a strangely blighted rite of spring, an implacable fertility ritual which revealed the grotesquery of dehumanized sex; ultimately, a work which conceivably dared to ask if rape is actually the default sexual act in the animal kingdom.
Waityou’ll need the catalog number if you want to see it: ADF Video 1984.0013, at
Read on, and respond in comments.
| Grain | Quartet | ||||
| 2 stars | 4 stars | ||||
| Eiko & Koma, Charian & Peace | Eiko & Koma, Charian & Peace |
Accept no substitutes
Eiko and Koma’s protégés serve sterile Grain, before a promising world premiere
By Byron Woods
In a career of dystopic performances that have let audiences examine the suffering of humans and nature on an almost frame-by-frame basis, this one was a stand-out. Call it a strangely blighted rite of spring, an implacable fertility ritual which revealed the grotesquery of dehumanized sex; ultimately, a work which conceivably dared to ask if rape is actually the default sexual act in the animal kingdom.
Waityou’ll need the catalog number if you want to see it: ADF Video 1984.0013, at
After a 2004 residency at the Reyum Institute of Arts and Culture in
Reportedly after prodding from an ADF administration concerned with the long-term preservation of their work, Eiko and Koma agreed to place Grain, an early work, on two Reyum students: 17-year-old So Chakreya (known as ‘Charian”), a female dancer, and her 18-year-old male counterpart, Sorn Setpheap (called ‘Peace”).
One immediate question should come to mind: Can two teenagerswith little background in the dance forms Eiko and Koma excel inbelievably convey the dark gravitas and emotional complexity of the striated relationships depicted in Grain? The answer: Only to a point.
To be accurate, a complete side-by-side comparison of the works is impossible, since the bleakest sections of the original were either excised in toto or considerably brightened up in last week’s edition. Plus, the opening sequencenow featuring two nude bodies on stage, not onewas performed by the original cast, before the entrance of their protégés: Reportedly, Charian chooses not to perform nude.
Certainly, many elements of the original are present, and occasionally, the new version improves over the old. The ferocity of Charian’s depiction of something resembling a bird of preycrouched over, with arms arcing down, perched atop Peace’s side as he lay in a near-fetal positionexcelled the first interpretation. It clearly suggested an animal about to feed upon a creature either helpless or dead.
But the subsequent heavy liftingwhen her character literally picks him up and browbeats him toward the back of the stagewas absent. The subsequent reversal in which she vainly flailed arms and legs to pull out of his lap and embrace while both crouched at center stage was muted beyond recognition.
The same went for the original, violent sexual contact in a mid-work sequence where Eiko’s lifeless body was repeatedly shaken as it tilted backwards, after Koma slithered up from between her legs to hold her bisected form at mid-torso. The grotesque, coercive sex in the work’s last moments was substantively toned downquite possibly removed entirelyjust before Peace’s hand slammed two lit candles into a mound of cooked rice, plunging the work into final darkness.
Grain leaves us with some inconvenient questions: What precisely has been ‘preserved” when a dance work is so altered that one of its fundamental original points is entirely obscured? Did casting teenagers for such forbidding and sexually frank subject matter set this restoration project up to fail from the beginning?
Whatever the cause or intent, the present version of Eiko & Koma’s dark classic can be only said to contain a few selected grains of the original’s truth.
Thankfully, the news is better from the world premiere of Quartet. Apparently, Lisa Race isn’t the only artist with aging on her mind. As a singer intones what can only be called a Cambodian blues, Eiko and Koma’s substantially older and physically damaged characters repeatedly compare their own compromised forms with four idealized figures painted on oversized canvases that fill the back of the stage. (A video clip from the performance is available here.)
After moments of near supplication to them, Koma’s character turns andin a very rare developmentsmiles, as he first remembers and then attempts to recreate old dancing moves. Predictably for this genre, when the old body cannot support the gestures, his character suddenly falls to the floor. After extended stillness, he slowly, painfully resumes.
Eiko and Koma’s other points of comparison on stage? The bodies of Charian and Peace, as they lie either sleeping or dead at the start (something of a toss-up here, since the lyrics of the folk song refer to dead children as merely sleeping). While Peace reposes, Koma’s hand smoothes across his arm and shoulder, as if he were admiring the craftsmanship of an exquisite sculpture.
The sculpture reference is later reinforced as Peace and Charian assume strikingand pitilessposes as simultaneously perfect and remote objects of beauty. That emotional remove is compromised only in one instance when Charian looks with alarm as Koma slowly grovels at her feet; her facial expression apparently asking, ‘What is there to be done?”
There is more than a touch of Faulknerand Ionesco’s La Leçon, for that matterin this work. A Southern world premiere seems particularly appropriate for a piece which suggests how the old disable the young, and how the past keeps the future from happening. There’s substantial and tragic economy in this tale of how the old recognize their former beauty in the youngand are therefore compelled to destroy it.