Earlier this month, the Durham City Council’s voted 6–0 to have the Boston-based Fallon Company redevelop the former police headquarters site instead of the Washington, D.C.-based Akridge, which had partnered with the Durham-based (and black-owned) New South Ventures. The council cited Fallon’s experience in affordable-housing developments among other factors in its decision. 

In a fiery response, Kenneth Spaulding, the lead counsel on the Akridge bid—a former state rep whose father co-founded NC Mutual—says this move will exacerbate downtown Durham’s “gentrified segregation.”

“The current city council members, except for Mark-Anthony Middleton [who did not vote], are now complicit in the re-segregation and exclusion of black property owners in downtown Durham,” Spaulding writes. “This is very simple.

“The proposed African-American ownership and partnership with a nationally recognized developer offered the city more money (over $2 million more), more affordable housing, more local ownership, and more African-American ownership than the other developer. Black private ownership diminishes gentrification and would have diminished downtown Durham’s current ‘gentrified segregated’ district.

“The six council members indicated that the two proposals before them were both excellent proposals. However, the city’s unelected staff preferred the developer from Boston. The six council members who voted for this developer’s proposal failed to serve and lead the Durham taxpayers. Each one of them has decried gentrification, yet when they had a chance to practice what they preached, they failed.

“Others may be afraid to call out the council for this shameful vote, but I am not. Their vote shows utter disrespect for black inclusion and ownership in downtown. We will not lose our history, and we will maintain our legacy. With this in mind, I am stepping aside from my practice of law to focus my attention—with many others, young and old—to help end this ‘gentrified segregation’ in our community. 

“The best way to do this is to change the leadership of Durham.”

Want to see your name in bold? Email us at backtalk@indyweek.com, comment on indyweek.com or our Facebook page, or hit us up on Twitter: @indyweek. 

This post has been edited to include that Spaulding representing the losing bid. 

Support independent local journalism. Join the INDY Press Club to help us keep fearless watchdog reporting and essential arts and culture coverage viable in the Triangle. 

5 replies on “Letters: The Durham City Council Voted for Gentrified Segregation”

  1. 2020;is upon us and we are peddling backwards in race relations that’s starting with 45 down to our local government. White American please stop hurting everyone with your white privilege learn to live with others other races of people deserve a opportunity to.

  2. As a 1-year+ resident in Durham, I cannot claim to fully understand the issues. However, I was prompted by this article to check the racial balance of the Durham City Council… I counted 4 blacks out of 7 members. If they did not vote for a particular developer, could it not be that they had valid reasons that are not racially motivated?

  3. I’ll file this letter under sour grapes. I am proud of our present city council. No, I don’t agree with every decision made, but I agree with their vision and leadership.

  4. “Member of losing bid team upset that they were member of losing bid team; uses buzzwords to shame people responsible”

  5. From a quick search, Akridge bought the Trust Tower, which NSV did the renovations on, and is finishing that project. They also are doing the NC Mutual Building. I don’t know that having the same company doing all the big projects is the way to go. I certainly don’t think they are being shut out.

Comments are closed.