
Yesterday, the Trump administration dealt a blow to LGTBQ students and advocates across the country, rescinding Obama-era guidelines for protecting transgender students in public schools.
The announcement, which came in a letter (see below) from Department of Justice and the Department of Education officials, said that the administration is withdrawing guidance put forward by the Obama administration to public school systems last May. The Obama administrationโs guidance, which was legally nonbinding, directed schools to let students use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their gender identities. The federal law the Obama White House cited, Title IX, prohibits sex discrimination in schools.
In other words, the Trump administration just withdrew the Obama administrationโs informal guidance on trans studentsโ bathroom use. While this means that transgender students, already vulnerable to bullying, certainly have no ally in Trumpโs White House, itโs unclear how the decision will play out in North Carolinaโs public schoolsโor whether anything will actually change.
After all, nationally school districts were not required to follow the Obama-era guidelines, which werenโt enforceable.
โWhile the decision on the guidance is incredibly disappointing, it doesnโt exactly change the law here,โ says Tara Borelli, an attorney with Lambda Legal. โNothing about this impacts schoolsโ obligations to follow Title IX and the Constitution. Our firm view is that both Title IX and the Constitution require schools to respect studentsโ gender identity in all spaces, including restrooms and locker rooms.โ
But in North Carolina, these provisions are complicated by HB 2, Ames Simmons, the trans policy director of Equality NC, explains. Among other things, HB 2 requires people to use public bathrooms that correspond with the sex listed on their birth certificate, not necessarily their gender identity. That trickles down to public schools.
โThere definitely is a uniform statewide policy on trans studentsโ bathroom use in public schools in North Carolina, and that is set by HB 2,โ Simmons says. โHB 2 prohibits local school districts from making their own decisions about how to deal with trans studentsโ bathroom use. All students in public schools must use restrooms that match their โbiological sexโ as defined under HB 2.โ
But whether or not individual school districts in the state are complying with HB 2 is another question.
Officials from the Wake County Public School system didnโt respond to the INDYโs request for comment on their bathroom policy for transgender students Thursday. But, as The Charlotte Observerreported this summer, compliance with the directives varies across the state. Schools in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, for instance, honor studentsโ gender identity in bathrooms and locker rooms. In Durham County schools, transgender students are allowed to use private facilities, like staff and single-occupancy bathrooms. And in Chapel Hill-Carrboro schools, single-stall bathrooms have been converted into gender-neutral bathrooms.
โThe only thing that has changed is that when school systems reach out to the Department of Education and say, โWe now have a trans student in our public school, weโre not sure what we should do,โ the Department of Education is no longer going to tell them, โYou should let trans students use the bathroom in accordance with their gender identity,โ says Simmons. โIt is not as if trans students donโt have rights anymore. They still maintain the right to sue a school system if they feel that they are being discriminated against.โ
Indeed, yesterdayโs news came as several relevant lawsuits are pending before the courts. After the Obama administrationโs issued its guidelines, thirteen states challenged the protections, and a Texas federal judge put them on hold in August. Meanwhile, next month, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in a lawsuit filed by a transgender high school student who sued his school board for preventing him from using the boysโ bathroom.
And then thereโs North Carolina. As a refresher, the Justice Department under Obama sued the Tar Heel State after it passed HB 2.
Yesterday, state lawmakers (this time a bipartisan group) made yet another attempt at repealing HB 2. Led by Republican Chuck McGrady, the bill, which we discussed yesterday, wasnโt particularly satisfactory to a range of opponents, including Governor Roy Cooper. Representative Grier Martin, a Raleigh Democrat, blasted the bill on Twitter, saying it was โin no way, shape, or form a repeal of the discrimination of HB2.โ
Chris Sgro, the executive director of Equality NC, called the proposed legislation a โtrain wreck,โ adding that the sponsors โdouble down on discrimination and reaffirm worst parts of HB2.โ
โAnd Cooperโwho offered his own lackluster compromise last week to repeal HB 2โsaid in a statement released Wednesday that he remained โcommitted to repealing HB 2โ but was โconcerned that this legislation as written fails the basic test of restoring our reputation, removing discrimination, and bringing jobs and sports back to North Carolina. I will keep working with the legislature.โ
Meanwhile, itโs not even clear if the new bill will have enough support to advance through the House and the Senate.


You must be logged in to post a comment.