Spring films at NCMA from & about Italy
Last month, the North Carolina Museum of Art completed its slate of winter films, which was a celebration of 100 years of Universal Studios. The titles ranged from Destry Rides Again to Touch of Evil, from Written on the Wind to two James Whale classics.
Before the film programming shifts to the outdoors, thereโs a special mini-season of indoor films devoted to all things Italy. Inspired by film curator Laura Boyesโ recent vacation, itโs titled Vacanza Italiana. Accordingly, the lineup features dolce vita selections, not neorealism, blackshirts or unemployment. (Thatโs for winter!)
This Friday, the series kicks off with perhaps the ne plus ultra of โquality cinema,โ A Room With a View. Shockingly, this Merchant Ivory classic adaptation of the E.M. Forster novel is now 28 years old. Its three principal cast members are still going strong: Daniel Day-Lewis, Helena Bonham Carter and the dowagerโs dowager, Dame Maggie Smith.
The other titles are similarly felicitous: Divorce Italian Style (April 26), with Marcello Mastroianni and Stefania Sandrelli; Von Ryanโs Express (May 3), with Frank Sinatra; the biggest date movie of 1988, Giuseppe Tornatoreโs Cinema Paradiso (May 10); and the utterly charming Roman Holiday (May 17), in which Audrey Hepburn is a princess adrift in The Eternal City with Gregory Peckโs reporter close behind.
โข 8 p.m. Fridays April 19-May 17
โข $7, $5 students & museum members

Most Friday nights, die-hard film fans converge on the North Carolina Museum of Art to take in a movie in the East Buildingโs auditorium. But while they usually enjoy the selection, whether itโs a W.C. Fields comedy (that this reporter introduced) or a Godard head-scratcher, theyโre not exactly comfortable.
โItโs no secretthe sight lines are horrible,โ says Jenni Elion, a North Raleigh resident whoโs been a regular movie watcher at the museum since she moved here in 1993.
It appears the museum hasnโt done much to elevate the moviegoing experience for its audience. The 272-seat auditorium hasnโt had any major changes done since it opened 30 years ago as a lecture hall. Since then, itโs become a reliable draw for repeat visits to the museum for the Triangleโs only repertory outlet for classic cinema. (Disclosure: The indoor offerings are programmed by Laura Boyes, an occasional contributor to INDY Week. She was not consulted for this story.)
โIโd at least like to see them rearrange the seats so they are staggered the way they usually are in a theater, instead of dead-on right behind each other,โ says Elion. โIt would be nice if they could expand and get more seating, because the movies are getting more popular.โ
Many of the screenings from last fallโs film series, โWomen of Film Noir,โ were sold out, prompting the museum to turn away latecomers. The recently wrapped โUniversal Studios @ 100โ winter series was popular as well.
โMore and more are selling out,โ says Elion. As for why the museum hasnโt done anything to renovate the auditorium, she has a theory: โI think that maybe films are not viewed as art so much as entertainment.โ
Museum employees say that improving the auditorium has always been a top priority. George Holt, director of performing arts and film programs at the museum, said there were initial plans to overhaul the auditorium when the museum started building its West Building a few years back.
โWe had originally hoped that a new auditorium or a small theater would be a part of that expansion project,โ says Holt. โAnd then, it was in the original plan. And then, with cost overruns that occurred, it was left on the cutting room floor, you could say.โ
Dan Gottlieb, the museumโs director of planning and design, agrees.โWe had lots of plans to do that and quite a bit more,โ he says.
Gottlieb said there were talks of building a purpose-driven new theater as part of the expansion. Unfortunately, it was not affordable in the expansion itself, which cost $72.2 million.
What also wasnโt affordable was fixing up the old auditorium. โWe just didnโt get the repair and renovation funds to do the complete renovation of this building, as we had hoped. So we have a series of priorities,โ says Gottlieb. โThe auditorium is certainly one of them.โ
While Holt says moving out of the auditorium space is not an option, the museum is looking for ways to do substantial renovations within the existing auditorium.
โWe live for the day that we might have a little larger and more comfortable theater to present the film program in,โ says Holt. โActually, weโre working on a grant proposal right now to renovate this space.โ
Both Holt and Gottlieb agree that in order for renovations to be made, there must be a budget of a half million dollars. Gottlieb says they are in the process of getting money through a grant from an unnamed foundation.
โWeโre kind of in the early stages in discussions with the foundation,โ says Gottlieb. โWe are hopeful, but weโre not going to put all our eggs in that basket. Weโre going to look beyond that as well.โ
The museum has pondered some alternative fundraising ideas. For example, Holt says, โIf we can attract enough people to be willing to sponsor a single chair, you know, at whatever level it would take to actually provide the new seating,โ says Holt, who credits Boyes with the idea.
โWe know that there are definitely some models for that out there. Some theaters have used that technique with some success.โ
The money would go not only into getting better, comfortable seating for the theater, but also toward getting new projection equipment. With theaters all over the countryand in the Triangleswitching over to digital projection, even the museum understands that the theaterโs reel-to-reel projection system soon could become obsolete.
โAs I understand, itโs gonna be more and more difficult to obtain films in nondigital format in the future,โ says Gottlieb. โI think there will always be a place for that, but you have to have the ability to show digitally.โ
Holt also agrees that, even though theyโve upgraded the projection and sound system a few years ago, the auditorium has to step up its game for the 21st century.
โNeedless to say, we need to add a quality digital projection system at some indeterminate point down the line,โ says Holt. He also notes the option of switching out the theaterโs 11.5-by-30 foot screen. โIt is quite possible that weโll change out the screen if the money becomes available, certainly add curtains and masking.โ
For the time being, the museum is still coming up with ways of turning the auditorium into a decent screening room.
โWe do have a couple of ideas about how we might be able to lift the back seating a little bit and increase the sightlines somewhat,โ says Gottlieb. โItโll be incremental, but if we do that and stagger the seating with new equipment, I think we can make some pretty good improvements. Weโre not going to make it into a bigger venue, but we can certainly make it into a much more attractive and more functional venue.โ
This article appeared in print with the headline โTheater of pain.โ
Correction: NCMAโs director of planning and design is Dan (not Brad) Gottlieb.


You must be logged in to post a comment.