
As Robbie Robertson might say, take a picture of this: Choreographer Robin Harris, a tall, thin, somewhat gaunt-looking woman, is standing alone, a few feet from the end of a wooden pier. She faces us, looking landward, as we stand between her and the shore. Behind her we see a medium-sized inlet, perhaps a kilometer or two across, with a grove of tall trees on the far shore. Also behind her, just now: a massive storm, a cumulonimbus soufflรฉ of epic proportions.
At this distance, we can see that the cloud mass extends for miles, both across and straight up; its meringue-like topping towering above what looks to be an angry iron billow boiling at its base. Just now, a slight breeze disturbs Harrisโ hair; the gentle first fingerings of the exponentially larger, darker thing behind her.
I wish she werenโt so calm. I also wish I didnโt know that she did not plan to leave.
Is that an overreaction, I wonder, to Weather Is Very Important, Harrisโ new work that debuted during the N.C. State Dance Companyโs spring concert at Stewart Theater? Perhaps. But at times it seems the choreographer embraces the hidden poetry of the Beaufort scaleโthe 12-stage visual classification system for wind speedโwhile drastically minimizing the physical reality that scale attempts to represent.
And isnโt there something schismatic about this particular pairing of artist and subject from the start? Wind implies weightlessness, a slight or increasing disorder; random, vast and aimless, formless movement; and in its most intense state, chaos and destruction. For all her many admitted strengths, the ordered gravitas of Harrisโ recent choreography brings none of these qualities particularly to mind.
The number of still images that crowd the far end of the scale are also telling. For a whole gale, at stage 10 out of 12, a woman lies on her side with her arms above her, on a old gray wooden dock thatโs been erected some four or five feet above the floor of Stewart Theater. Stage 11 storm is represented only by a static, flimsy aluminum beach chair that, after several moments, flies up and off stage on a wire. The visual image for the terminal stage, hurricane, on the Beaufort scale? Five life-preservered bodies lying motionless, face down, in a tell-tale orderly row, among the blue-illuminated pilings at the bottom of the pier.
No, the picture is not the wind. But when this collections of images begins to animate as the dancers reiterate its various stations with increasing speed, the result suggests some flipbook of yesteryear devoted to semaphores. Thatโs when we grasp itโs not the pictures Harris is focusing on. Itโs the human response: the bodies in the wind, and then beneath it.
This is obvious in the middle section, which comprises the ethical as well as physical center to Harrisโ new piece. After extended slow somersaults and other long passages from the pier into the water, Harrisโ quintet enacts a slow, roiling mass to Gabriel Faureโs stately ordered Pavane. The water now slamdances all the bodies in itโwith grace perhaps, but without mercyโhere, in extreme slow-motion.
One woman bows, with both arms swept sideways. Another woman is held momentarily, before the force lifts her from the grasp. Another person points their finger at us, in accusation or warning. A woman dives backward and is swallowed in the chaos.
Iโve thought a lot about this moment since I saw the work. I really donโt need an image, or a representation more graphic than this, of what actually happened in New Orleans the night Katrina hit.
The past year has proven to allโexcept, perhaps, the present governmentโthat warmed water and wind can totally erase the human scale from any map. The hurricane is not concerned with politics or intentions. It does not negotiate or receive petition. It will not wait.
The pointing finger from the woman in the waves is a reminder: We are small. The wind is large. Weather is important. And another storm is always coming.
REVIEWS
****1/2 Three Sisters (On Ice), Little Green Pig Theatrical Concern, Manbites Dog TheaterโWhen director/adaptor Jay OโBerski takes considerable liberties with Chekhovโs script and Brian Frielโs adaptation, the result is an outsized, profane and gleeful descent into emotional slapstick and existential carnival; a show that caroms off the far walls of theatrical chaos and spectacle before landing in fair territory. Katja Hill, Dana Marks and Gigi DeLizza ably embody different thwarted desires as three Moscow chicks, stuck in the sticks, succumbing to the worst case of cabin fever in recorded history. The bizarre at timesโbut ultimately fittingโsymbolism, vivid, original imagery, and intuitive leaps on display contrast the charactersโ absurd fantasies about relationships with the even more absurd human truth about learned helplessness, before a trippy ending that doesnโt leave usโcompletelyโwithout hope. Take that, Stanislavski. (Through May 13.)
** Sh*tk!cker Monologues, Common Ground TheaterโA septet of regional stage veterans and newbies aim to please, but Roger Karshnerโs monologues are too thin to give this show much by way of connective tissue, and too manipulative after a while for us to keep caring. The mixed abilities in an otherwise genial sing-along string bandโand those altered geographical cues in the text that kept us whipping back and forth between the mideastern United States and western Chatham Countyโdidnโt help matters. (Through May 14.)
E-mail Byron at [email protected].


You must be logged in to post a comment.