The Raleigh Police Department released footageย today taken from several officersโ€™ body cameras the night in November that LaDonna Clark says her elderly parents and six-year-old sonย were ordered out of their Southeast Raleigh home at gunpoint so police could execute a search warrant.ย 

In a statement posted with the video, the RPD said the footage vindicated its officers and contradicted the Clarksโ€™ stories. โ€œAll officers were some distance away and were behind cover as the Clarks exited the residence,โ€ the RPD says. โ€œNo weapons were pointed at the Clarks as they exited the house.โ€

But there are no close-ups of the child or grandparents leaving the home, and much of the footage is shot from a distanceย and difficult to make out. (Raleigh police told the INDY Friday afternoon that there were no close-ups because โ€œthe officers were some distance away for safety reasons.โ€) However, guns appear to be in both frames that show the grandparents exiting the house.ย 

The INDY broke LaDonna Clarkโ€™s story earlier this month, before she alleged at a Raleigh City Council meeting on February 5ย that police had pointed military-style rifles at her six-year-old son,ย who has special needs, and parents, Wanda and Michael Clark, as they exited their homeย November 14 before police executed a warrant.

The copsย were searching for evidence in connection with a November 12 armed robbery at a Capital Boulevard AT&T, inย which LaDonna Clarkโ€™s nephew Brian Clark is a suspect. Brian Clark allegedly left a box at the scene with Michael and Wanda Clarkโ€™s Friar Tuck Road address on it.ย 

After the incident, LaDonna Clark says she attempted to open an internal affairs complaint with the RPD, but the police attempted to stonewall her, requesting in-person interviews before the complaint could proceed.ย When she came into the station to view the footage, LaDonna Clark says, she was only shown a short clip of body-camera footage of her father exiting the home, shot from a distance. (According to RPD spokeswoman Donna-maria Harris, LaDonna Clark was only allowed to see the portion of the footage that showed her son, which is different from what she said she saw.) Frustrated with what she believed was the policeโ€™s disinterest in her complaint and failure to investigate the incident, she took her story to the ACLU and city council member Corey Branch.

In a memoย earlier todayย to city manager Ruffin Hall, police chief Cassandra Deck-Brown blamed the Clarks forย any miscommunication: โ€œUpon initial review of the [body-camera] video, members of [the internal affairs unit] did not observe any evidence to corroborate the allegations made by Ms. Clark. After the Clarks reviewed the video and obtained the documents, a sergeant with [internal affairs] attempted to interview the Clarks to gather additional details about their complaints. Mr. Clark then stated they needed time to read over the documents and contemplate what they saw on video. โ€ฆ Neither Ms. Clark nor Mr. Clark contacted [internal affairs] to follow up on their complaint. On February 1, 2018 [sic], Indy Week contacted the Raleigh Police Department about the warrant service at 3318 Friar Tuck Rd. [Internal affairs] attempted to contact LaDonna Clark by email on February 1st. As of this date, RPD has not received any further communication from the complainants.โ€

In the forty minutes of footage the police released after obtaining permission from the Superior Court, multiple officers are seen staged in and around the home.ย Itโ€™s dark outside, and details are difficult to make out. At about the seven-minute mark, you can see from a distance Michael Clark exiting the home and walking backward between cars parked in the driveway, toward the white SWAT van parked on theย lawn. As he is walking, the officer filming through a body cameraย lifts a large, dark object into the frame.ย 

RPD spokeswoman Donna-maria Harris confirms that this is a rifle.

โ€œIt appears that the officer was adjusting the shoulder strap which caused the top of the rifle to come into view of the camera,โ€ she told the INDY in an email. โ€œAt all times, the barrel of the weapon remains pointed at the ground as Mr. Clark exits the residence.โ€

Later, in a video taken from another officer,ย you can see the vague outlines ofย Wanda Clark and the child exitย the home with the outline of a gun in the forefront of the frame.ย 

โ€œThe officer positioned at the rear of the house had his rifle pointed at the ground, as he has been trained to do, for the duration of the video, including when Mrs. Clark and the child exited the house,โ€ Harris wrote. โ€œAny insinuation that the weapon came into view only when Mrs. Clark and the child exited the house is inaccurate.โ€

The police issued the following statement in the video released on YouTube: โ€œThe video and investigation do not support Ms. LaDonna Clarkโ€™s allegations that her family had rifles pointed at them or that they were made to sit ouside [sic] for over an hour. While members of [SWAT team] did have rifles, they kept them pointed at the ground or away from people at all times while the Clarks were exiting and outside the home.

โ€œWhile we understand and respect that this was a difficult and challenging situation for the Clark family, the members of the Raleigh Police Department carried out their difficult and dangerous police responsibilities professionally, with respect, and in accordance with law and policies.โ€

While LaDonna Clark said her family was kept outside for more than an hour, the police say the raid lasted only twenty minutes.ย ย 

Reached Friday, LaDonna Clark told the INDY the video does not prove guns werenโ€™t pointed at her childย and says sheโ€™s outraged she that the footage was posted publicly when she was only permitted to view a short clip.

โ€œI shouldnโ€™tย have had to sit and go through all these damn hoops and hurdles just forย you to show me something,โ€ LaDonna Clark says. โ€œThis only substantiatesย as well as validatesย my concern this damn department is just doing whatever the hell they want and just puppeteeringย the series of events where now you have just invaded my familyโ€™sย privacy by showing all that unnecessaryย stuff that you wouldnโ€™t even allow my father to see.โ€

She adds, โ€œYou canโ€™t sit here and tell me you have a whole SWAT team and you donโ€™t actually have footage of them walking out. I want to see footage of them walking out.โ€

Ivanna Gonzalez, an advocate for the Police Accountability Community Taskforce who has been working with the Clarks, says the footage โ€œhighlights that [police] are trying to skirt around this on a technicality perspective.โ€

โ€œTo me, this speaks to a police departmentย that is really interested that they wereย fine on policy, but are not interestedย in talking about the dignity of human beings and whether they traumatized a black family andย if they are OKย with that as collateral damage in police investigations,” Gonzalez says. โ€œThe video is consistent with what the family says they experienced and whetherย itย was thirteen minutes versusย what could have felt like an eternityย doesnโ€™t matter to me, becauseย what theyย experienced was really traumatic and [police] donโ€™t seem to care about that.โ€

This story has been updated with comments from the Raleigh Police Department.ย 

View the full video here:ย 

UPDATE:

LaDonna Clark and the Raleigh PACT held a press conference to address the RPDโ€™s release of body-camera footage Friday afternoon.ย 

โ€œI consider it a violation of my familyโ€™s civil rights and privacy that RPD orchestrated the release of some of this footage as a public relations stunt,โ€ LaDonna Clark said. โ€œRPD, Iย am still going to hold you legally, morally,ย and ethically responsible for the laws you should adhere and abide by. You will not deceive or bamboozle the public by releasing carefully crafted video that shows you going into the household,ย however refusing to show the video of my son and my mother,ย as well as my father.โ€

She added, โ€œYou will not bully or silenceย me by justifying or rationalizing the unnecessary use of force towards a child with autism and two senior citizen parents.โ€

Watch the whole press conference here:ย 

One reply on “Raleigh Cops Say This Body-Cam Video Vindicates Them. You Be the Judge.”

  1. This situation vividly displays the limitations of Police Body Cam footage.
    I won`t call Citizen Clark a liar….
    Nor will I call the Raleigh PD liars….
    Frankly… You really cannot tell SQUAT about the actions of SWAT from this POV mess of poorly-framed reality.

    In fact, the only telling truths that come clearly across to me, are that our law enforcement is becoming EXTREMELY para-military in it`s go-to approach to anything more than traffic stops, and all the shaky-blinder-bracketed camera footage shows is a subjective reality whose reference points are defined by perception, of not by actual film-editing.

    It`s too bad that none of our presidentially-villified so-called ‘lying media’ were on hand to document this incident with wide-angle lenses and a better vantage point.

    As it goes, all I am left with is the uncertainty of what really happened at that legally-warranted search….
    ….and the certainty that it was a bit of a stretch in reason & logic calling out a tactical response SWAT team approach on a ‘Definite Maybe’ that the SUSPECT in question just MIGHT be there–assuming that he was grossly stupid enough to be staying anywhere that he had been previously known to live after committing a Felony.

    Bottom Line: Innocent Citizens Terrorized, No Suspect Apprehended.

Comments are closed.