David Cox is very sad.
The sixty-one-year-old incumbent on the Raleigh City Council was the only of his cohortโthe current development skeptical majority who have been calling the shots since 2017โto win re-election outright Tuesday.
โI should be elated for this victory,โ he wrote in a post on social media. โInstead I am the exact opposite.โ
Cox defeated challenger Brian Fitzsimmons with 54 percent of the vote from District B. The other members of the cityโs Growth and Natural Resources Committeeโa five-person block formed after Cox and crew usurped Mayor Nancy McFarlaneโs committee appointments in 2017โdid not fare as well; in District E, Stef Mendell was obliterated by challenger David Knight, who garnered nearly 70 percent of the vote; Kay Crowder was overpowered in District D by newcomer Saige Martin, who received 47 percent of the vote to her 33 percent; and Russ Stephenson came in third in the at-large race after Jonathan Melton. District Aโs Dickie Thompson decided not to even try and seek re-election. He will be replaced by Patrick Buffkin.
These so-called NIMBYs have wielded control of the council for two years. No matter what happens next month, they wonโt have a majority anymore.
And while Stephenson and Crowder may call for a runoff, their chances of winning arenโt great. Nor are chances great for their political ally in the mayoral race, Charles Francis, who is expected to call for a runoff just like he did against McFarlane in 2017. On Tuesday, Mary-Ann Baldwin defeated Francis by seven points, with Francis netting only 31 percent of the vote. Thatโs fewer votes than he got against McFarlane in October 2017 and he ultimately lost by 18 points in the November runoff.
So more than likely, Cox will be left the odd man out when the new city council is seated in December. And heโs not happy about it.
Nor is he trying to make nice. On Wednesday, he thanked supporters for his victory, despite a โconstant barrage of attack mailers filled with misrepresentations and, in some cases, outright lies,โ but also threw a not-so-subtle barb at the prospective newbies on the council.
โI am grateful for another opportunity to serve and represent the residents of District B and the City of Raleigh. Whether this new Council will do the same remains to be seen,โ Cox wrote.
On Thursday, he abandoned subtlety altogether.

Instead of trying to build bridges, Cox prefers to hurl unfounded accusations against his soon-to-be colleagues.
Thereโs a lot to unpack here, but first offโhis fearmongering isnโt accurate. None of the candidates supports the RDU quarry, nor have any proposed filling the downtown with billboards. While many candidates think the CAC system needs to be looked at again so that more citizens can be engaged in decisions, cutting funding hasnโt been discussed.
And a Sheetz on every corner? Really? Thatโs your nightmare?
These divisive tactics are partly why the rest of Coxโs cohort have likely lost their seats. While Cox remains, he will effectively be stripped of his powerโa lone man with a raised fist shouting at the sky as the new council moves the city forward in the direction the voters asked for; heโll be the dissenting vote, the outraged social media post.
And if he keeps up the antics, it may only be for one more term.
In some ways itโs poetic justiceโ thatโs how the GNR crew has treated council member Nicole Stewart this whole time, as an outsider excluded from discussions until it gets to the council chamber.
Stewart, however, says she will take the high road come December.
โI refuse to treat him the way they treated me the last two years,โ Stewart says.
Maybe Cox should take a note.
Support independent local journalism. Join the INDY Press Club to help us keep fearless watchdog reporting and essential arts and culture coverage viable in the Triangle.


David Cox was also busy “hiding” comments on his cranky Facebook post with which he disagreed. When called out on this behavior, he unhid all comments critical of him and then called me a liar. He’s as anti-free speech as they come, and I hope he is isolated on the council for his malfeasance.