
Join 24,000 of your neighbors who read the INDY Daily newsletter.
There's an INDY newsletter for you. Find it here.
We're the INDY, the Triangle's alternative newspaper for the last 40+ years. Get the good stuff straight to your inbox.
We'll send a verification code to %EMAIL%.
Backtalk: Beer drinkers who were demanding better choices
Share this:
Last week, for the web, we wrote about Samโs Bottle Shopโformerly Samโs Quik Shop and Blue Light, all Durham institutions owned by the Boy familyโand its current owner John Boy Jr.โs plans to close the shopโs doors for good next month. Samโs Quik Shop was one of the first to bring curated, craft beer to the Triangle market, as reader Julie Johnson recalled in an email, and the shopโs knowledgeable staff, not to mention its vast collection of specialty beer, will be missed by many:
The thriving craft beer scene in North Carolina owes a big thanks to John Boy and Samโs Blue Light. During the years-long effort to modernize NCโs beer laws through the legislation known as Pop the Cap, Samโsโalready a pioneer in bringing unusual beer to the stateโwas a steadfast supporter. Pop the Cap represented beer drinkers who were demanding better choices; John Boy gave us invaluable backing and the perspective of an independent retailer, which was important in shaping our approach to the legislation.
When House Bill 392 (the โPop the Capโ bill) passed in 2005, it raised the permissible beer alcohol content from under 6% to 15%โand opened the market to an eye-popping range of previously unavailable styles. And local businesses responded: todayโs community of over 420 NC breweries and brewpubs is about ten times the number operating in 2004.
The day the bill passed, I drove to Samโs and bought my first bottle of stronger beer, a Chimay from Belgium, from John. I wish him a very happy retirement, and many thanks.
P.S. One happy memory of the Blue Light on Erwin. I was entertaining a well-known beer writer who was visiting the area, and I took him to Samโs. My guest was astonished when a modest-looking gas station and car wash attached to what appeared to be a convenience store turned out to have one of the best specialty beer selections (and best-informed staff) to be found anywhere.
In our paper two weeks ago, we published a letter from Durham Sheriff Clarence Birkhead, a supporter of the ShotSpotter gunshot detection technology. The sheriff wrote that he was disappointed that Durhamโs City Council didnโt extend the use of ShotSpotter as experts at Duke evaluate data gathered during the yearlong ShotSpotter pilot. Reader Brittany Price wrote in response to Birkheadโs letter that ShotSpotter isnโt the answer to the gun violence that troubles Durham and other U.S. cities:
About a year and a half ago, I lost a loved one to gun violence in another city. Shotspotter didnโt identify the outdoor shootout he was in as gunfire, but they did change their data at the police departmentโs request after he died. While plenty of neighbors called 911, he didnโt survive, and if he had, the circumstances around his death almost certainly wouldโve landed him in prison.
I work in public health, and a sad, true joke we make in my field is that when public health is working, itโs pretty invisible. Itโs not as punchy as a headline about a scoop and run that gunfire detection technology enabled, but it does save more lives. And Shotspotter simply doesnโt save lives the way preventive measures do; a growing body of research backs this up, including Doucette et al.โs comprehensive 2021 analysis. It is easy to say that the expenditure on this technology is worth it if it saves one life, but the truth is weโre working with limited resources; spending this amount of money on tech that doesnโt work is an insult to the memory of people who couldโve been saved by preventive measures. My friendโs life is a testament to that: I know for a fact he was saved multiple times by harm reduction and affordable healthcare. He wouldnโt have been in the situation that took his life if heโd had access to affordable housing, to steady, well-paying income and benefits that didnโt exclude him for his criminal record. And I sincerely believe the person who shot him wouldnโt have been there, either. They both deserved better than wasted money on Shotspotter. So do we. Durham is hurting. Itโs tempting to throw Shotspotter at that pain, but we must turn toward what works and invest in our community.
Comment on this story at [email protected].
Support independent local journalism.
Join the INDY Press Club to help us keep fearless watchdog reporting and essential arts and culture coverage viable in the Triangle.