
Laurie Anderson has long been one of my favorite artists. Her unique brand of performance artthe genre the artist claims for herselfcould be called postmodern storytelling: a mix of spoken word, the electronically altered human voice, and ambient or pop music grooves mixed in with the occasional odd lyric and visual projection. Gradually, Anderson has segued from ribbing technology and the cult of expertise to exploring the ways in which weโre profoundly alienated by them. As I wrote when she performed Happiness at Duke in 2002, the strongest of her recent works are technological ghost storiesin which we find ourselves, ironically enough, the ghosts.
That said, I take no joy in reporting that Homeland, her latest work, which opened Duke Performancesโ 2008-09 season Thursday night in Page Auditorium, is the weakest of at least eight live performances Iโve seen by her over the past 20 yearsalong with the various film, audio and video documentations of her work Iโve experienced since 1983.
For if chilly stories and wry, plangent social observations have always been Andersonโs greatest strength, even her most devoted fans have to admit that her songwriting has rarely, if ever, been as accomplished. Taken as a whole, the songs in Homeland are not strong. In more than one case, an endlessand indulgentseries of far too incremental lyrics should have been edited to make for shorter and more potent works. Elsewhere, needless, extended-mix repeats of choruses and bridges exhausted the audienceโs patience, as was witnessed by the walkouts that began mid-performance. Even the wittiest of Andersonโs new songs, โProblem,โ had worn out its welcome before the last in a lengthy series of reiterations of the tag line โOnly an expert can deal with a problem.โ Andersonโs prettiest songs are too gossamer to hold together; the grittiest, too preachy and obvious.
One of the showโs few highlights involved the Voice of Authority, the name Anderson has given the male persona she explores in monologues, delivered in an electronically lowered voice. Though weโve been hearing his commentary since the 1980s, he has never sounded more wistfulor chillingthan now.
In โMambo and Bling,โ after riffing on an election year political joke, the Voice said, โCome on, letโs hear it for the clowns.โ After a moment in which the audience didnโt respond, he then said, โNo? Fine. Your silence will be considered as your consent.โ Though that line was repeated a time or two as well during the sequence, its political and social implications actually grew more powerfuland soberingwith each reiteration. Would that we could say as much for the rest of Ms. Andersonโs musical filibuster Thursday night.


You must be logged in to post a comment.