
Kristin Clotfelter/Studio C Projects:ย On You
โ โ โ ยฝ
Monkey Bottom Collaborative, Durham
Bathed in red light, Pin-Han Lin finds her shape against a wall. Her maneuvering resembles rock-climbing without the toe-holds that enable vertical lift; still, it seems conceivable, with her arms reaching toward the piping overhead, that sheโs hovering. Her posesโspiky and fixed, like theyโre outlined in chalkโprompt Kristin Clotfelter to ask two questions as she crosses the room toward Lin: โHow are you doing? What are you working on?โ
I’ve employed these workaday interrogations with friends and colleagues to anchor the emotional heavy-lifting of the first question in something more material: the specifics of a project, the outline of an idea. But in Kristin Clotfelter/Studio C Projectsโ On You, the inquiries arrive together, modifying and answering each other through movement. โHow are you doing?โ becomes a technical question when Clotfelter assumes a position similar to Linโs along the wall. One way to ask and to listen, Clotfelter and her fellow movers demonstrate, is to try to integrate the movements of another. The sequence of actions that make up the fifty minutes of On You enact a sort of reciprocal pedagogy, a physical experimentation thatโsย collaborative and mutually attentive.
Clotfelter, Lin, and Matthew Young channel a gentle investigative energy from the get-go. As we enter Monkey Bottom Collaborative, Clotfelter asks each of us if she can make our portraits. If we agree, we lean in and find ourselves reflected in a square mirror as she traces our necks, chins, and hats onto an old-school projector sheet. When the messy, colorful pile of our faces is later beamed onto the wall, I find myself tugged by the appeal of easy self-recognition. Seeing an approximation of my face assures me I was there, like a Sharpie scrawl on a bathroom wall, a participatory token.

But what the projector makes visible is just the most literal trace of our presence in On You. As Clotfelter, Lin, and Matthew Young proceed from room to room, they sling, pocket, and rearrange space as if theyโre making one big contour drawing of us. When they approach audience members, they seem most interested in the negative space between us and them. As they align their elbows with ours or return a smile, they understand weโre also complicit in sculpting the air andย in creating the dance. Whether we do and if we respond is, at least in the moment, a different question.
This focus on audience attention is critical to the work of many local dance makers. Its choreographic implementation, however, can sometimes feel soย invested in individualย flash points thatย the largerย thematic heftโthe stakesโis leftย elusive. Inย On You, I kept thinking of the portrait representations we agreed toย and the conversational encounters between performers: moments when a power dynamic and an ethics began to emerge, more weighted than ethereal.ย
In all the ways they move, Clotfelter, Lin, and Young are compelling guides. In particular, Clotfelterโs spatial inventions urge new phrase-making; in my notes, I refer to her gestures, both consolidating and buoyant, as โsocketeering.โ When she asks Young what heโs up to, his skittish energy manifests in a leg flap, a torso tug, and a clear statement that belies the scrambled movement: โIโm trying to communicate nonsense.โ What follows is an extended, inclusive workout of this idea, as Clotfelter both tries on and warps Youngโs physical expressions, filling the room in pursuit of confusion.
James Clotfelterโs design work is a crucial choreographic element. His staging is the most clever and intuitive Iโve seen in Monkey Bottom Collaborative, which can feel more suited for a middle-school lock-in than experimental dance. His procedures tie the rooms, and the dances, together: the projector light illuminates a disco ball, but when shifted down from the ceiling, it creates a tight square box where Lin and Young make shadow-play onstage. Each technical transition refocuses our attention on the dancers, who send the energy, however subtly, back to us.
Iย came to regard the showโs titleโOn Youโas neither a burdening gesture nor an aggressive request for participation. Itโs more about how audiences feel themselves implicated, on a micro level, in dance work. Mostly, itโs just a soft propulsion, a wave sent from across the room, from dancer to dancer, dancer to audience, audience to audience, body to body. It urges, but doesnโt prescribe, self-recognition in the unfolding action.


You must be logged in to post a comment.