The day we learned the American job market had lost 3.3 million jobs in a week, the Dow gained 1,300 points on news that the Senate had reached a deal on a $2 trillion coronavirus rescue package. Sure, the stock market isnโ€™t the economy. But the dissonance is jarring.ย 

As large as it is, the bill Congress passed last week probably wonโ€™t avoid a recession. The hole is that deepโ€”and itโ€™s compounded by the fact that the U.S. is the only developed country where health care access is largely tied to employment, and millions of people are now unemployed amid a fast-spreading, increasingly deadly pandemic.

On Thursday, the U.S. eclipsed 1,000 coronavirus deaths. On Friday, just eight days after documenting coronavirus case 10,000, we became the first country to log number 100,000. On Saturday, we exceeded 2,000 deaths. The governmentโ€™s foremost infectious-disease expert said on Sunday that he expects between 100,000 and 200,000 deaths. (Trump, who a month ago promised to quickly eradicate the coronavirus, said that would mean heโ€™d done a โ€œvery good job.โ€ Goalposts, moved.)ย 

Keeping fatalities at even that level will require measures at odds with the presidentโ€™s other goal: restarting the economy as quickly as possible. Last week, he floated relaxing the Centers for Disease Control and Preventionโ€™s social-distancing guidelines to โ€œreopenโ€ the country by Easter Sunday, April 12.ย 

Three days after that, according to a new model from the University of Washingtonโ€™s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the coronavirus crisis will peak nationwide, with nearly 2,300 deaths projected on April 15 alone. (This model predicts 82,141 deaths through July 15, assuming that the country maintains strict social-distancing practices until the summer.) Perhaps with that peak in mind, Trump reconsidered. He announced on Sunday that heโ€™d keep the current guidelines in place through April 30.ย 

The presidentโ€™s desire to kickstart the economy is understandable. Nothing snuffs out reelection campaigns quite like a recession. As good as Trumpโ€™s recent polls have beenโ€”48 percent approval in Fox News and Washington Post/ABC News surveys, 45 percent in a Pew Research Center poll, all personal bestsโ€”maintaining that perch will become more difficult the longer this morass drags on.ย 

This push-pull tension between economic health and public health has created two overlapping phenomena, both taking their cues from Trumpโ€™s primal impulse to downplay the latter to boost the former.ย 

The first is denialโ€”a spectrum of COVID-19 Truthers, from Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves, who overrode local stay-at-home orders by declaring nearly all businesses โ€œessential,โ€ and who says his critics โ€œdonโ€™t like the fact that Iโ€™m a conservative and Iโ€™m willing to pray;โ€ย to a contingent of Trump supporters who attack scientists and deny the crisis is all that bad, alleging that itโ€™s instead part of a media-hyped deep-state conspiracy to bring down the president.ย 

The second is a sort of free-market nihilismโ€”the people who say that, sure, COVID-19 might kill a lot of people, but thatโ€™s the price of a flourishing economy. The most prominent is Texasโ€™s lieutenant governor, Dan Patrick, who told Tucker Carlson last Monday that he would gladly die for capitalism, and he expected that most other 70-somethings would do likewise: โ€œNo one reached out to me and said, โ€˜As a senior citizen, are you willing to take a chance on your survival in exchange for keeping the America that America loves for its children and grandchildren?โ€™ And if that is the exchange, Iโ€™m all in.โ€ย 

Patrick was pilloried (by everyone except Brit Hume, that is). But his real crime was saying the subtext aloud.ย 

Thereโ€™s always a tradeoff between capitalism and public health, and capitalism usually wins. (We still have coal-fired power plants, for example.) Capitalismโ€™s benefits tend to be immediate (cheap energy!), while the problems it causes are more abstract (how do we know climate change made last yearโ€™s hurricanes worse?). But the coronavirus is different. We know it could kill 100,000 people if we do everything right, and many times that if we donโ€™t. We also know that by doing the hard part now, we can spare ourselves much more pain down the road.ย 

Knowing that and nonetheless advocating that we cast aside measures that will save the lives of not only our grandparents but of our friends with diabetes and our coworkers with high blood pressure and our neighbors who are cancer survivors to boost our fortunes and our 401Ks or to win an electionโ€”that takes a special kind of callousness.ย 

Dan Patrick, after all, had drawn inspiration directly from Donald Trump, whoโ€™d tweeted earlier that day: โ€œWE CANNOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM ITSELF.โ€ Trump, it seems, had only been restrained by the bad optics of relaxing restrictions and cheering on American commerce while hospitals were overflowing with corpses.ย 

So please tell me: What stage of capitalism is this?


Contact editor in chief Jeffrey C. Billman at [email protected].ย 

DEAR READERS, WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW MORE THAN EVER. Support independent local journalism by joining the INDY Press Club today. Your contributions will keep our fearless watchdog reporting and essential arts and culture coverage viable in the Triangle, coronavirus be damned.